Today 34-year-old chess champion Magnus Carlsen married 26-year-old Ella Victoria Malone, “in a ceremony packed with guests on a sunny winter day in Oslo,” reports Chess.com.
According to Norwegian newspaper Dagbladet, a film crew from Netflix was also present. The streaming giant is shooting a chess-related TV show rumored to air in 2025… Ella Victoria is now expected to have a more central role in her husband’s career. According to VG, she played a crucial role in securing Magnus a deal with fashion brand G-Star Raw…
Their wedding was surely a fairy tale, but the Carlsens aren’t heading for their honeymoon just yet. Magnus is set to make his debut for St. Pauli in the German Bundesliga on January 10, when he’ll face Dusseldorf led by none other than GM Gukesh Dommaraju.
The article adds that “For Carlsen, this caps off a whirlwind week that began in New York, highlighted by his eighth World Blitz Championship title,” a victory that they say was “controversially” shared with Russian grandmaster Ian Nepomniachtchi. CNN reports:
[Carlsen] had taken a 2-0 lead in the four-game contest before Nepomniachtchi launched a stunning comeback to level the scores, sending the match to a sudden death tie-break. The pair then drew the next three games, and it was later determined that they would share the title after the proposal was accepted by Arkady Dvorkovich, the president of chess governing body FIDE. “I thought, at that point, we had already played for a very long time and I was, first of all, very happy to end it, and I thought, at that point, it would have been very, very cruel on both of us if one gets first and the other gets second,” Carlsen later told reporters….
[T]he decision to share the Blitz title with long-time rival Nepomniachtchi has sparked outcry from some of the world’s top players — the first time in history that a world championship title has been shared. “This is a situation where I cannot stand with what Magnus has done,” prominent player Hikaru Nakamura said on his YouTube channel. “I do not think that there is any precedent for this, when you put out rules about the game itself and then suddenly you decide, ‘It’s okay, we’re going to go home’ … It’s unconscionable to me….”
“FIDE goes from forfeiting Carlsen (over the jeans debacle) to creating an entirely new rule,” Hans Niemann, whom Carlsen had defeated in the quarterfinals, wrote on X, formerly known as Twitter. “Seems like the the regulatory body of chess has no intention of being unbiased. They seem to only care about what one player thinks….” Former world champion Garry Kasparov made a pointed reference to the jeans controversy, writing on X: “I thought the first FIDE tiebreak was pants.”
Magnus apparently tells his opponent “If they like refuse, we can just play short draws until they give up,” according to a behind-the-scenes video clip posted to X.com. The CEO of FIDE, Emil Sutovsky, re-posted it on X.com, complaining that FIDE president Dvorkovich’s decision to accept the players’ proposed draw was made “under the spur of a moment, and of course, the video appeared much later. I do think it is VERY BAD though…”
FIDE later told CNN that “This situation has already prompted valuable discussions within FIDE management to improve our regulations.” (And their article adds that some — including grandmaster Ivan Sokolov — suggested ties be settled with a new chess format known as Armageddon.) “In Armageddon, White has more time but a draw on the board counts as a win for Black,” explains the Guardian — adding that back in 1983, “Fide determined the winner of a Candidates match by a roulette wheel.”
The Guardian adds that Russian-born FIDE president Arkady Dvorkovich “probably felt he had little choice but to rubber stamp the agreement by the players.”
He would have been pilloried in Moscow as preventing a Russian world champion had he ruled otherwise, and a negative could also have provoked a series of the notorious Berlin draws, the standard method for a quick mutually agreed half point. However, that course of action would have brought the players into disrepute, and it is more likely that an inspired game or a blunder would have settled the final. The audience on Wall Street applauded the decision, but the considerable online reaction from professional players and fans has been mostly critical.
It was the first ever shared over-the-board individual world title in chess history.